Save hours
Concise histories from long records, in minutes. Users report saving up to 70% of the time on record review, and up to 40% across the whole case.
Generate a medical history in minutes, shaped to your specialty, and verify any fact at the source, so your time goes into the Statement of Fact and the Opinion, not the paperwork before them.
No AI-generated error has reached a finished report; every finding is traceable to source for verification.
From draft histories to defensible opinions: source-linked summaries and searches that save hours.
Hundreds of pages across GP and hospital sources; mixed formats and repetition make it slow to establish what happened and when.
See which documents in your case are most relevant to your discipline, group them by source, and export a reading set. Less time locating what matters, while supporting your professional responsibility to read the original records.
Answering questions like "When was duloxetine first used?" means trawling hundreds of pages by hand, and trusting that nothing was missed.
Find the facts in the records relevant to the case, and jump to the original document. Supports Part 35 questions, preparation for meetings with counsel, and revising for court appearances.
Producing consistent, well-referenced sections is time-consuming, and copy-paste risks errors. Referencing sources in the Statement of Fact means reading back through multiple summary sections.
Export chronology blocks for your report, with references to the original documents. Health Narrator does not draft opinions; that stays with you.
Preparing for expert discussions and Joint Statements means manually comparing long reports to find where opinions align and diverge.
Health Narrator cross-references your report against other expert reports on the same matter, surfacing alignment and divergence ahead of discussions.
We help medico-legal experts prepare faster and ground every statement in verifiable fact.
Concise histories from long records, in minutes. Users report saving up to 70% of the time on record review, and up to 40% across the whole case.
Ask direct questions; get clear, referenced answers, verified at the source in one click.
Start from a draft history with the diagnostic appraisal in clear view; spend your time on analysis.
AI turns complex records into contextualised, searchable, referenced insight.
The full record bundle put into a chronology for your specialty.
Turn long, unstructured records into a clear chronology (problems, meds, allergies, investigations and red flags) shaped to your clinical discipline.
Plain-English questions with source-linked answers.
Ask in plain English ("When was duloxetine first prescribed?") and jump straight to the cited line in the record.
Drafts to save time. Never your opinion.
Generate draft report sections that pre-populate the medical history. Where there are symptoms and signs, Health Narrator can check whether diagnostic criteria are fulfilled: clarity that is central to the opinion section. You always review and edit.
The responsible alternative to consumer AI. Health Narrator is built for professional healthcare use, meeting UK GDPR/DPA, NHS DSPT, and DCB0129 standards for data protection and clinical safety. All information is processed within secure environments and never shared with third-party systems. What courts now expect of experts using AI →
"It's like having a critical friend who's read the whole bundle, points me to what matters, and helps me verify the facts. I save time, am less likely to miss information, and feel even more confident in my opinion."Dr Alexis Bowers Consultant Psychiatrist
"It is easy to miss crucial data with large bundles of PDF files and Health Narrator helps me avoid this. It's a great tool to support my work."
"It has transformed how I work. I can focus my attention on the key parts of the clinical record so much faster, and spend more time where I add value, forming an opinion."
Practical, referenced guidance on writing reports and reviewing records.
Structure, the medical history, the opinion, declarations, and the faults reviewers find.
A worked structure, a sample chronology, and what good looks like.
What UK courts and regulators now expect, and what a defensible answer looks like.